Plus500 vs Saxo Bank

If you are reading this article, you are likely having trouble deciding whether Plus500 or Saxo Bank is the better Forex trading platform for you. While both platforms generally provide positive user experiences, there are some essential differences to note.

In this Plus500 or Saxo Bank broker comparison, we outline the highlights of each trading platform to help you make a more informed decision. We evaluate:

Feature Plus500 (visit site) Saxo Bank (visit site)
Plus500 Saxo Bank
Headquarter: Israel Denmark
Regulation :
Type of Broker:
Market Maker ECN/STP
U.S. Clients Allowed:
TRUE for corporate clients
Minimum Deposit:
$100 $500
Maximum Leverage:
1:30 Dependent on asset class and account type
Commissions / Spreads:
Variable Spreads Variable
Account 1:
CFD Classic
Account 2:
Account 3:
Account 4:
Demo Account:
Islamic Account:
Segregated Account:
Managed Accounts:
Institutional Accounts:
Website Languages:
  • English
  • Chinese
  • Other
  • English
  • Chinese
  • Other
Support Hours:
24/7 24/5
E-mail Support:
SMS Support:
Broker Offers:

Features and Platforms

Plus500 has catered to clients since 2008, but only offers its proprietary trading platform. It ignores those in need of the MT4 infrastructure, those who use automated trading solutions, which remains the fastest-growing segment of the financial system, and those who favor social trading, which has staged a comeback over the past few years. New traders do not have an adequate educational section, and Plus500 does not provide research for clients. Denmark-based Saxo Bank launched in 1992 as an online broker and became a bank in 2001. It offers traders an excellent choice of proprietary trading platforms and considers itself as a FinTech company. SaxoStrats offers in-house research provided by its global team, and a comprehensive educational section adds value for new traders. Saxo Bank remains one of the most competitive banks and brokers in operation today.

Feature Plus500 Saxo Bank
Type of Platform: Proprietary platform, Web-based Proprietary platform, Web-based
Platform Languages:
  • English
  • Chinese
  • Spanish
  • Italian
  • French
  • German
  • Other
  • English
  • Chinese
  • Other
OS Compatibility:
  • Windows
  • Mobile
  • Web
  • iPhone
  • iPad
  • Windows
  • Mobile
  • Web
  • iPhone
  • iPad
Trading Signals:
Charting Package:
Market Analysis:
Chart Trading:
Automated Trading:
Mobile Alerts:
Trailing Stops:
Guaranteed Stop Loss:
Guaranteed Limit Orders:
Guaranteed Execution:
One-click Execution:
Interest on Margin:
Web-based Trading:
Mobile Trading:

Available Markets

While Plus500 offers traders an excellent asset selection, it is no match for that provided by Saxo Bank. Most traders will find the 71 currency pairs at Plus500 sufficient, but the 182 pairs at Saxo Bank remain among the most offered by any broker. Plus500 delivers a broader commodity exposure with 22 versus 19 at Saxo Bank. The former has 585 options contracts and 1,737 equity CFDs, bested by the latter where more than 1,240 options contracts and over 9,000 equity CFDs await traders. While Plus500 added 95 ETFs, Saxo Bank features 3,000+ and more than 500 mutual funds and managed portfolios, together with 19,000+ regular stocks and bonds. Overall, Plus500 grants clients access to 2,400+ assets versus 40,000+ at Saxo Bank, which maintains one of the most comprehensive asset choices among all brokers.

Feature Plus500 Saxo Bank
Binary Options:

Typical Spreads and Fees

The commission-free trading environment at Plus500 offers most retail traders an advantage, but spreads remain higher compared to Saxo Bank. Whereas the former levies a minimum mark-up of 0.8 pips, it is just 0.4 pips at the latter. Saxo Bank implements a competitive commission structure as low as 0.06%, with most markets at 0.10%, while Plus500 does not add additional costs in exchange for a higher spread. Swap rates on leveraged overnight positions apply, and portfolio adjustments related to corporate actions exist, together with third-party payment processor costs. The currency conversion fee at Plus500 is 0.50% versus Saxo Bank, where it ranges between 0.10% and 0.75%. Given the broad market exposure at Saxo Bank, the cost structure is more in-depth but does not apply to all traders, as it is asset dependent.

Security and Trust

Client deposits at Plus500 and Saxo Bank remain segregated from corporate capital, and the trading environment is secure at both brokers. The former, a UK publicly-listed company and constituent of the FTSE 250, had a 2012 FCA fine for misreporting transactions. It was also found to have misled investors in 2017 regarding client exposure. Saxo Bank faced allegations of misconduct in 2010; the Danish FSA, its primary regulator, completed its internal review and ordered an independent investigation, which confirmed the absence of misconduct. Negative balance protection exists, where mandated by law. Both brokers maintain oversight from multiple regulators, and remain well-capitalized, while Saxo Bank is more trustworthy, as it has never faced a regulatory fine.

Plus500 vs Saxo Bank – Verdict

Most retail traders will find the commission-free asset selection at Plus500 more than sufficient if an execution-only broker fulfills their trading needs. Those seeking a superior trading platform, competitive trading tools, research and education, automated trading solutions, or social trading will not find them at Plus500, which neither delivers value-added services nor supports core trading elements. 76.4% of retail traders manage their portfolio at a loss at Plus500, which focuses more on sponsorship of sports teams than on improving the product and services portfolio for clients. Saxo Bank delivers an excellent core trading environment with a series of competitive proprietary trading platforms, with support for third-party developers. More than 420 financial institutions rely on its infrastructure, with full support for automated trading, while several third-party trading tools increase the competitiveness at Saxo Bank. An excellent in-house research team covers markets, and new traders may use any of the educational material to improve their ability to trade successfully. Saxo Bank delivers a complete package for demanding retail traders through professional ones to institutional clients and remains in a different league compared to Plus500. 70.0% of retail traders face a portfolio loss at Saxo Bank.

Read full Plus500 Review
Read full Saxo Bank Review


Which is the more reliable broker?

Both brokers offer a reliable trading environment, but Saxo Bank has more experience. Plus500 has served clients since 2008, while Saxo Bank has been in operation since 1992. Multiple regulators provide oversight, and Plus500 and Saxo Bank remain well-capitalized. There are no indications that either broker will face financial challenges, allowing all clients to trade with ease of mind when it comes to reliability.

What are the minimum deposits for these brokers?

The minimum deposit at Plus500 is just $100, making it accessible to most retail traders. Subsequent deposits of less than $100 are permitted, granting more flexibility to build a portfolio. Saxo Bank has various minimum deposits depending on geographical region and account type. With a minimum of $10,000, Saxo Bank does not cater to new retail traders. Some jurisdictions require less than that, while others up to $50,000.

Which broker is better for beginner traders?

While Saxo Bank provides superior education and a more competitive trading environment, the high minimum deposit makes it unsuitable for beginner traders. Plus500 does not offer any services for new traders, rendering neither broker a choice for beginners. Between the two, traders without experience can start at Plus500 as long as they can source essential trading tools elsewhere, while Saxo Bank remains out of reach for most.

What about MetaTrader and copy trading?

Neither broker offers MetaTrader, but the proprietary trading platforms at Saxo Bank remain notably superior to the sub-standard alternative at Plus500. Copy trading is not directly available at either broker, but given the support for third-party development at Saxo Bank, it remains a possibility.